As sectarian violence spins out of control in Iraq, today The Washington Post reports that Moqtada al-Sadr’s compound was struck with two mortars. He was inside and survived injury.
After the attack, al-Sadr released a statement with the obligatory call for calm. As translated by The Associated Press:
"I call upon all brothers to stay calm and I call upon the Iraqi army to protect the pilgrims as the Nawasib (militants) are aiming to attack Shiites everyday," the statement said, according to the Associated Press.
Or did he? The Post article points out:
In the past two months, attacks on two Shiite targets — a Shiite shrine in the city of Samarra, and Baghdad’s Sadr City neighborhood, a stronghold of Sadr support — have unleashed the greatest sectarian bloodletting since U.S. forces overthrew Saddam Hussein in 2003. Sadr issued similar appeals for calm after both attacks.
However, Sadr’s thousands-strong Mahdi Army militia is accused by many U.S. officials and others in the violent retaliation to the mosque bombing and Sadr City attack.
Al-Sadr uses the word "Nawasib" in his statement. It is a very loaded word and is code for inciting violence in otherwise benign statements. "Nawasib" is understood by the Shiite to mean "those who declared hostility against the household of the Prophet". It is an insult used to refer to Sunnis. It is not a word you would use when you are interested in reconciliation. It is a word you would use to incite hate and violence. To make the comparison more immediate, consider that there are similar words that racists use in the United States (and I will not repeat them here) when they are interested in hatemongering.
The radicals use our ignorance of their culture against us. They are very adept at playing the Bush Administration for full advantage, on the one hand, getting material support as the "good" guys in the Green Zone, and on the other hand, using that "material support" to kill innocents while we are patting ourselves on the back for teaching these people about democracy.
Hate always has many names. In Iraq, Hate sometimes likes to call itself "Nawasib".
Good article, but your typeface is waaaaaaay too small, hard on the eyes, especially ones as old as mine!
Got to do something about the typeface š
Or this is part of the more general fight of the Dawa and the Sadrists in order to keep the Interior Ministry, against the Sunnis and Khalilzad : underintented is “we are victimes of guerilla attacks everyday and we need to control the Interior Ministry in order to fight against those who attack the Shiites pilgrims”.
Untill the attack of the Mosquee in Samara, the Shiites have shown a remarkable restraint.
Just wanted to say I really liked the site. You have really put a lot of time into your posts and it is just great!
Feedburner is really very useful for syndicating feeds from other websites.”,,
i always watch current events on TV and also read newspapers daily to keep myself updated.*’
i always use feedburner to syndicate my blog posts to other subscribers.*,’
One third party voice about Cnn in the Television show. He has a seriously hard immigration policy. The master graduated on the Harvard College. At present he offers the one Radio Show. He did not such as your Nation us president.
i always stay updated about current events, specially disasters that happens around the world`”
dont be personal when you write any article, Nawasib is just a term used for those who hate the households of Prophet (pbuh).
feed burner is very useful for blog owners because it is easy to syndicate feeds using feedburner ‘-;
i always use feedburner for sharing the feeds of my blog, feedburner is really great,.;
Superior information and facts here, This is what iām trying to find. thanks, i’ve bookmark your site.
we should always be updated with current events because it is important for us to know the latest issues *”-
i always syndicate feeds on my subcribers and of course feedburner is definitely a great help ~*”
I am greately anxious regarding the upcoming election. With everything that is occuring in Iraq, Afghanistan, and the Middle East (not to mention the economy) we undoubtedyl must have a strong leader. I’m convinced that Mr. Obama or any of the Republican contenders thus far have the experience or skills necessary to get the job done the way it has to be accomplished. Being president of the United States is an remarkably hard job. Do you think there is someone out there with the experience, skill, and moral courage to do the job?