Decision Of The Ninth Circuit Court Of Appeals Rejecting Mohiuddin’s Petition

On February 23, 2007 the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in San Francisco unanimously denied Mohiuddin’s petition for review of the deportation order against him. Below is the Court’s decision:

Mohiuddin A.K.M. Ahmed petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (IJ) order denying asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 and we deny the petition.

Ahmed is ineligible for asylum and withholding of removal for two reasons:

(1) because he engaged in terrorist activity, and (2) because he assisted or otherwise participated in the persecution of others on account of their political opinion. Even his own account of his actions established that he assisted or otherwise participated in the persecution of persons on account of their political opinion.

Ahmed failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that his in absentia murder trial and conviction in Bangladesh was fundamentally unfair and thus deprived him of due process of law. Therefore, the IJ properly relied on the conviction.

Substantial evidence supported the IJ’s and BIA’s denial of protection under the CAT. Ahmed did not present evidence so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could find that he would not be tortured if returned to Bangladesh.

PETITION DENIED.

[Emphasis added by me.]

Mohiuddin’s supporters have claimed that he was not given due process in Bangladesh and that he would be tortured in Bangladesh. However, he was able to convince neither the Court of Appeals nor the Board of Immigration Appeals of his claims. Having been duly convicted in a court of law in Bangladesh of assassination and murder, having exhausted all his appeals in Bangladesh, and having his petition denied by the Court of Appeals in the United States, Mohiuddin is now trying to spin a false story in the court of public opinion. His guilt has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt. His only recourse now is to play a victim to curry sympathy from the likes of Congressman Dana Rohrabacher.

It remains to be seen whether this killer and coward will be able to continue to evade justice.

Posted in Bangladesh, Foreign Policy, Human Rights, Terrorism | 4 Comments

Mohiuddin’s Cold Blooded Murders – A Grandson’s Story

Sheikh Mujibur Rahman lies dead on the stairs

Sajeeb Wazed Joy, grandson of Bangladesh’s founding father Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, has written an account of the killing of his grandfather and most of his family by Mohiuddin Ahmed and his cohorts. Joy’s mother, Mujib’s eldest daughter, survived the massacre of August 15th, 1975 because she and her younger sister were in Germany at the time. The two daughters were the only members of Mujib’s family to have survived the events of August 15, 1975.

I wrote about Mohiuddin and his crimes yesterday. Today hear from a man who lives only by an accident of history:

My grandfather, even though he was the President, continued to live in his personal home in Dhanmondi instead of his official residence at Bangabhaban. It was an average house in a residential neighborhood. If any of you are interested in seeing the house, it is now a museum and I invite you to visit it. It has been preserved just as it was on that night in August 1975.

Mohiuddin and his cohorts killed the security guards and made their way into the house. They confronted my grandfather on the main stairway, where they shot him. They then proceeded through the house, shooting the rest of my family. They shot my grandmother, three uncles and my two older uncles’ wives.

My oldest uncle Kamal’s wife Sultana was five months pregnant and she begged for her life. They shot her anyway, but she was still alive until 9:00 in the morning. Mohiuddin Ahmed himself and another officer, Huda then ordered some of their junior officers to shoot her.

My youngest uncle Russell was just 10 years old. He was terrified and begged them not to kill him. One of the officers took pity on him and tried to save him. This officer took him downstairs and tried to hide Russell. Another officer said “He’s going to grow up like a snake and come back to kill us.” Then Mohiuddin Ahmed, Huda and another officer, Noor, shot Russell.

Along with my immediate family a total of 19 members of my family were murdered that night. My grandfather’s nephew and protégé Moni and his wife were shot in their home right in front of their two sons, Parash and Taposh, who were 6 and 4 at the time. My uncle Moni’s wife was pregnant as well.

The killers then buried the bodies in 18 unmarked graves at the Banani graveyard in Dhaka. To this day we do not know who is in which grave. Only my grandfather was buried separately in his home village of Tungipara.

This narrative was pieced together from confessions of some of the killers and eyewitness accounts, mostly by the staff that worked at my grandfather’s house. Some of them still work for my family.

Read the entire post on Sajeeb Wazed Joy’s blog.

Update: The Los Angeles Times published an article today that features an interview with Sajeeb Wazed Joy. The article also confirms that Mohiuddin’s deportation order will not be enforced until after April 16th.

Posted in Bangladesh, Foreign Policy, Human Rights, Terrorism | Comments Off on Mohiuddin’s Cold Blooded Murders – A Grandson’s Story

A Terrorist Hides In The United States

Mohiuddin A.K.M. AhmedOnce you have seen tanks on the streets, you are never the same.

I was born into genocide and I grew up a witness to terrorism. I am scarred by man’s inhumanity to man. Killers have laid their filthy hands on my head, smiling as they gave me life advice. I took a different advice – that of my father. I believe in human rights and the rule of law, I believe in due process and I believe in the cause of justice – even if justice is delayed.

Three decades delayed. My hair is grayer, my hair is thinner, but my resolve is strong.

On August 15, 1975 I woke up to a violent day. My older brother brought the news of tanks on the streets. The radio brought the news of the murder of Bangladesh’s founding father and his family. The Washington Post reported the news to the world outside:

At 12:30 a.m., the plan began to roll. Led by officers of the 1st Lancer Regiment, 13 Soviet-built tanks, donated to Bangladesh by Egypt last year, rumbled out of the military cantonment just a few miles from Dacca airport on the outskirts of the capital.

The tanks fanned out, three of them going to Mujib’s modest bungalow in the Dhanmundi section of the capital, one tank and an artillery piece to the home of his nephew, Sheikh Falzul Huq Moni, and a company of infantry-men to the home of Mujib’s brother-in-law, Serniabat Abdur Rab, the minister for flood control.

At Mujib’s house, the scene was bitter and bloody. A senior officer loyal to the president, Brig. Gen. Jamil Ahmed, rushed to tell Mujib of the approaching troops. Minutes after he got to the house, it was surrounded. He went outside to argue with the officers and was shot dead with three machine gun rounds in his chest.

According to some sources, the officer leading the troops at the president’s house, a major named Huda, handed Mujib a document of resignation to sign. Mujib, in a characteristic outburst, refused and roundly abused the young officer.

At that point, according to these same sources, one of Mujib’s sons, Sheikh Jamal, burst into the room with a pistol in his hand and was shot dead. Mujib again cursed the officer. Then another son, Sheikh Kamal,  stumbled into the room, shouting for help from the Rakkhi Bahini. Huda, armed with a Sten gun, cut down the son.

Then, as one source put it, "the real massacre began." Soldiers rushed into the house and began searching the rooms. In quick succession they opened fire on Mujib’s wife, who was sobbing hysterically, their two new daughters-in-law and their youngest son, ten year-old Russell.

The soldiers discovered Mujib’s brother, Sheikh Nasser, hiding in a second-story bathroom and they stabbed him to death with bayonets. They also killed two servants.

At Sheikh Moni’s house, also in the relatively comfortable Dhanmundi section, a tank opened fire and a large shell missed the building and impacted in the neighboring Mohammedpur section, killing a dozen people. The soldiers also killed Moni’s wife and a child.

Flood Control Minister Rab was killed in his home and his wife was shot, too, but she reportedly survived and is hospitalized.

At 5:15 a.m. in the morning of August 15, 1975 a Major Dalim announced over Radio Bangladesh that the army had taken control of the country and changed the name of the country from the People’s Republic of Bangladesh to the Islamic Republic of Bangladesh. Major Dalim, and his co-conspirators, mostly Majors and a few Colonels, disgruntled members of the Bangladesh Army, took control of the country and arrested the major political leaders of the country, including four surviving leaders of Bangladesh’s war of independence. These officers became known as the "seven Majors".

The Islamist-leaning Majors ran Bangladesh until they were forced out of the country on November 3, 1975 by senior officers of the army. However, the night before they fled, they managed to enter Dhaka Central Jail and murder the four leaders they had previously jailed:

Four former top aides of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, imprisoned since the president was killed in a bloody coup Aug. 15, were killed Monday morning in Dacca’s central jail, Bangladesh Radio announced Wednesday.

The broadcast came as a group of Bengali officers in Bangkok, ejected from Bangladesh after Monday’s coup, charged that the coup and the killings were part of a move toward military dictatorship.

Khalid took control after it had been decided that Farook [the August 15th coup leader], 14 other young officers, 2 top noncommissioned officers and 12 wives and children would leave Dacca for Bangkok.

Farook and Lt. Col. Khandakar Abdur Rashid said the officers left Bangladesh to "avoid widespread bloodshed." Their departure for Bangkok apparently diffused a 21-hour standoff in the squalid streets of Dacca between infantry troops led by Khalid and armor and artillery forces loyal to President Mushtaque.

"Our main guns would have caused a bloodbath among the diplomats, their wives and children," said Farook. Asked if there wasn’t a certain irony in his concern after he and his fellow junior officers had cold-bloodedly murdered Mujib and his entire family on August 15th, he replied, "We killed only those who had to be removed. Our original plan was to kill just Mujib, but we had no choice. We had to kill the others too, although we’re very sorry about that."

Before the "seven Majors" and their co-conspirators fled, they managed to pass the Indemnity Act giving them immunity for the killings they were involved in. The events of 1975 began a 16-year period of military rule in Bangladesh. After democracy was restored in Bangladesh in 1991, the Indemnity Act was finally repealed in 1996. Finally, more than two decades after their crimes, in 1997, the government of Bangladesh began criminal proceedings against the participants in the murder of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman in August 1975. Initially, of the 20 charged, 15 of the coup plotters were convicted and sentenced to death in November 1998, after a two-year trial. Only five of the accused were in court for the hearing – the rest were absconding abroad and tried in absentia. Of the five present, three were convicted and two were acquitted. On appeal, the High Court of Bangladesh in 2001 upheld 12 of the 15 original convictions.

One of those convicted and sentenced to death, in absentia, was Major (relieved) Mohiuddin A.K.M. Ahmed, one of the "seven Majors". He was specifically convicted of being one of the killers of Sheikh Mujib and his family. He had enjoyed the life of a diplomat during the period of military rule in Bangladesh. However, in 1996, he permanently fled Bangladesh and sought political asylum in the United States. He has resided in the United States since then. Soon after his arrival in the United States, the Bangladesh government requested the extradition of Mohiuddin from the United States.

In 2002, the United States issued a deportation order against Mohiuddin. Mohiuddin appealed his deportation order. In February 2007, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco denied Mohiuddin’s appeal of the deportation order. On March 13, 2007 Mohiuddin was arrested by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers.

Mohiuddin now claims that he was just manning a roadblock near the house where Sheikh Mujib was killedand that he was not involved in any violence. It is an argument the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals rejected:

Ahmed, then an army major, says that although he manned a roadblock a mile from President Sheikh Mujibur Rahman’s home, he thought the leader would be arrested peacefully.

"Myself and others believed that the orders we received were lawful," Ahmed said. "At no time was I, or my troops, involved in any violence."

But Rahman and seven family members, including his wife and 10-year-old son, were killed, and the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Ahmed had participated in terrorist activity.

"Even his own account of his actions established that he assisted or otherwise participated in the persecution of persons on account of their political opinion," a three-judge panel of the federal court said last month.

Mohiuddin is now playing victim and he has at least one taker in Congressman Dana Rohrabacher:

Ahmed’s family and lawyer want him deported to another country where he could seek political asylum and fight his conviction. His lawyer, Joseph Sandoval, said Ahmed cannot appeal in Bangladesh because he was not in the country during his trial.

"Essentially, they want to take him from the plane to the gallows," Sandoval said. "We think that is fundamentally unfair." He added that his client is not the "heinous person" the U.S. and Bangladesh governments have made him out to be.

But time is running out. Ahmed was to have left the country Monday night, but Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-Huntington Beach) called Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff’s office and requested a delay.

"Amnesty International and our State Department has questioned the integrity of the Bangladeshi judicial system," said Tara Setmayer, a spokeswoman for Rohrabacher.

"And because of that, Dana felt as though there would be no harm in trying to buy some time for his legal counsel to find a country" where he would not be put to death.

"Given the circumstances, he said he’d be willing to place a phone call or two to buy some time and figure things out," she said.

Rohrabacher is trying to pressure the U.S. government not to deport Mohiuddin to Bangladesh. If he is successful, a terrorist, by the U.S. government’s own account, will continue to evade justice.

Three decades later, we who lived in Bangladesh at the time still remember the names and faces of the murderers. We remember their public boasts about the killings. We remember how they plunged a secular republic into military rule and allowed Islamists to infiltrate the country. We know where they are hiding: in Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Libya, the United States and Canada. We keep our list of the killers close at hand.

Notwithstanding Dana Rohrabacher’s support for a convicted terrorist, it should be noted that Mohiuddin has received significantly more due process than any detainee at Guantanamo Bay. He received a two-year trial and an appeal to Bangladesh’s highest court that took another three years. He has been found guilty by a legitimate court of law.

In hiding in the United States, Mohiuddin has shown the cowardice that led him and his cohorts to murder women and children, in cold blood, including a 10-year old boy. He has lived three decades that he denied his victims. In his case, justice has not been swift. It has been delayed but deliberate. In the end, however, Mohiuddin will have to face his cowardice.

Update

Bangladeshi bloggers are covering this case extensively:

  • Drishtipat, the blog of the Bangladeshi human rights organization, has coverage here and here. They also have contact information for Dana Rohrabacher for those who want to write and express their concerns.
  • Rezwan, at The 3rd world view, has extensive coverage including many links to other bloggers here.
  • Salam Dhaka has updates about NPR coverage of this story here.
  • Shafiur, at Imperfect World, goes prehistoric on Dana Rohrabacher here.
  • Mohiuddin’s son, who is lobbying extensively for his father, has posted a defense of his father on his blog here. He claims to have "first hand experience" of the "truth". I leave it up to the reader to determine if the so-called "first hand experience" is the "truth". The only comment I would make is that Mohiuddin must have been sleep-walking the night of the murder not to have remembered his involvement in killing Mujib and his family or to not have heard the artillery shelling that most of the millions of Dhaka city residents heard.

Update #2

Two more important posts on this case:

  • Salam Dhaka writes that Mohiuddin’s deportation has been delayed by 45 days.
  • Sajeeb Wajed Joy, Mujib’s grandson, retells the story of the massacre by Mohiuddin and his cohorts. Compare and contrast this post with the "truth" as told by Mohiuddin’s son (in the link from the previous update above).
     
Posted in Bangladesh, Foreign Policy, Human Rights, Terrorism | 5 Comments

House Committee Investigating MZM

[Via Think Progress]

Henry Waxman is requesting information on White House contracts with MZM:

As part of the Committee’s ongoing investigation into waste, fraud, and abuse in federal contracting, the Committee has requested information on a $140,000 contract awarded by the Executive Office of the President to MZM, Inc. in July 2002.

The contract with the White House appears to have been MZM’s first prime contract with the federal government. Subsequent investigations of other MZM contracts had uncovered serious irregularities. To date, there has been no examination of the circumstances surrounding the company’s initial contract and the role that White House officials played in the award and execution.

I wrote about MZM’s contracts Sunday night. I noted that much reporting needed to be done. It is encouraging to see Congress investigating this issue.

 

Posted in General | Comments Off on House Committee Investigating MZM

The Lurita Doan I Know

Lurita DoanToday the Washington Post reported that Lurita Doan, the GSA Administrator, will testify this coming Wednesday in front of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee about recent reports of her involvement in the politicization of the GSA. The charges are serious and, if substantiated, she would be removed from her position in violation of the Hatch Act.

Before I discuss this latest scandal, I want to share my personal experience with Lurita Doan. I will warn the reader that I have a positive opinion of Lurita, and I ask that you take my bias into consideration when you read the following. Though we differ in our political views, I have immense respect for Lurita.

Lurita became the first female GSA Administrator on May 31, 2006. Before becoming GSA Administrator, she was the founder and sole owner of New Technology Management, Inc. (NTMI), a small federal contractor located in Reston, Virginia. She sold NTMI before becoming GSA Administrator.

I started working at NTMI in November of 2002. I worked there for four years. For part of my tenure there I led the technical staff in designing and developing a large-scale software application that helps detect and eliminate fraud for a large government agency.

During my time at NTMI I came to admire and respect Lurita. In a bit of coincidence it turned out that she and I attended the same college, ten years apart. Lurita is one of the most dynamic and charismatic people I have ever known in my life. She may also be the most driven and hardest working person I have had the pleasure of knowing. She has been a mentor to me and has been very supportive of me during my time at NTMI. In my long career in the IT industry, she is one of the few CEOs I have met who earned my respect for her honesty, her hard work, and her ability to communicate effectively and build rapport at every level in the company. I am grateful to have known her and have learned much from her.

Lurita is also nothing if not blunt. She will tell you what she thinks and has a very low tolerance for excuses. When she is in a room with you, she commands and demands attention by the sheer force of her personality. Her bluntness has made her many enemies in her short tenure in the government.

Those of us who worked at NTMI knew that Lurita was a long-time supporter of the Republican Party and the Bush Administration. In fact, she was one of the speakers at the 2004 Republican National Convention. She has also met with Mr. Bush as a woman small business owner in 2004 and was cited by Mr. Cheney in his speech at the Small Business Administration in 2003. So, it did not come as a surprise when she was nominated for the position of GSA Administrator.

However, unlike companies like MZM (which I wrote about yesterday) and their meteoric rise, NTMI’s business did not benefit from Lurita’s Republican Party ties. A look at NTMI’s contracts will show the less than stellar performance by the company over the last six years. I should know – I slaved over preparing many responses to RFPs only to be outbid by companies offering a better price or with more experience or leverage. NTMI’s fortunes dwindled when the company graduated from 8(a) status (the graph of NTMI’s revenue trend here will leave no doubt when NTMI graduated from 8(a) status). NTMI struggled, like other government contractors (with the exception of MZM and other shady outfits), to compete for bids in full and open RFPs against much larger and well established companies such as SAIC, EDS, CSC and others. It was an uphill battle in this competitive environment and NTMI suffered as a consequence.

Lurita has been a champion of women and minorities in business. Her appointment to the post of GSA Administrator was supposed to be a step forward for advancement of minorities and women in government. It was widely expected during her Senate confirmation that she would bring her energy and her drive to the GSA after a scandal-ridden period in the agency’s history.

Lurita replaced Stephen Perry as the GSA Administrator. Mr. Perry, you will recall, resigned in October 2005 in the wake of the Jack Abramoff scandal. Mr. Perry resigned two weeks after David Safavian, Perry’s chief of staff, was arrested for obstructing justice and his connections to Jack Abramoff. I should note that it was during Mr. Perry’s tenure that companies such as MZM, with no experience or revenue, mysteriously obtained multi-million dollar blanket purchase agreements.

Lurita was expected to clean up the mess at GSA:

Investigations in 2003 revealed the agency’s procurement organizations, particularly its Federal Technology Service regional shops, had parlayed their reputation for quick turnaround with few questions asked into a scandalous misuse of technology contracts.

Doan, who stepped in more than half a year after Perry quit on Oct. 31, 2005, was expected to clean up the mess. She seemed primed for the job.

 

Doan exudes energy. She leans forward to emphasize points. She gesticulates. She visibly reacts with displeasure or pleasure. Her voice grows animated. She groans audibly when she hears something or encounters someone she doesn’t like. She is not shy.

 

But within weeks of her Senate confirmation, she picked a fight with NASA over the future of its Scientific and Engineering Workstation Procurement. She was accused of saying that the GSA inspector general’s staff "terrorized" regional administrators. She angered an already irritated Defense Department by resisting limitations on using Defense dollars.

Despite her energy, some of Doan’s efforts have backfired. The Office of Management and Budget renewed NASA’s governmentwide procurement contract and told her to "avoid unnecessary discordant publicity on this matter." Late last year, she capitulated to the Pentagon on how quickly its funds must be disbursed.

She picked the wrong people to pick a fight with in trying to eliminate government waste. She may have also made some political enemies inside and outside GSA who were accustomed to the Bush Gravy Train:

Contracts specific to a department or function of government, such as the Navy’s Seaport, a 2004 IT contract, and the Homeland Security’s Enterprise Acquisition Gateway for Leading Edge Solutions, an indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity technology acquisition, compete with GSA. For years, agencies other than GSA have run technology contracts open to all agencies. Doan contends they waste tax dollars.

 

"We just don’t want duplications," she says. "If it’s a unique requirement that’s being supplied by a particular [agency’s governmentwide contract], that’s fine." Otherwise, procurement should go through GSA, Doan says. Only GSA covers its costs by collecting fees as opposed to using appropriated funds, she asserts. Other agencies might say they’re not using appropriated money to support contracts open to all, "but unless you absolutely carve out your costs for your rent, you carve out your costs for the air you breathe, practically . . . then there’s an added burden to the taxpayer," she says.

I always suspected she would make powerful enemies with her style. She picked a fight with the biggest guy in the schoolyard – the Defense Department contracting office. It was probably a matter of time before she was pushed out.

Immediately after her tussle with DOD and NASA, articles appeared in the Washington Post about her falling out with the GSA IG and her attempt to offer a $20,000 contract to a long-time friend. Now the scandal has gone into overdrive because White House political staff were coaching GSA political appointees in a videoconference that was presided over by Lurita. This latest scandal reeks of the same politicization of the government that the U.S. attorney scandal reeks of. Given the central role GSA has played in the Jack Abramoff scandal and in the Duke Cunningham/Gonzogate scandal, it rings true that the White House is involved in across-the-board politicization of government.

I am disappointed that Lurita is alleged to be involved in the latest scandal. I eagerly await Congressman Waxman’s hearing this Wednesday to learn more. I do hope the investigation does not stop at Lurita. I expect, like in Gonzogate, that the Congress will hold the White House accountable and not be satisfied with being thrown scraps. With her blunt style and her immediate attack on government waste she is ripe to be thrown overboard by this White House as scrap.

Finally, I wrote this diary, from a personal point of view, partially because I saw an alarming diary on Daily Kos that called Lurita an unconscionable name. I hope, as we continue to ferret out corruption in the Bush Administration, that we do not lose sight of who we are and what our mothers taught us.

Thanks for reading, and now let the flaming begin.

 

 

Posted in Politics | 9 Comments