Bangladesh’s Cartoonist Hero

Arifur Rahman receiving anti-corruption award

Look at the young man in the picture above. That is 23-year old cartoonist Arifur Rahman. The military government of Bangladesh has found him such a threat to Islam that they have jailed him without charge and without any due process.

Read Zafa’s moving post (cross posted at E-Bangladesh) on the young man who, just a month before his arrest, received an award from the very government that has now taken his freedom away.

Arif is not a politician, nor is he a businessman, or a well-connected "civil society" type. He is a young cartoonist with a promising future. We demand that the military government of Bangladesh immediately and unconditionally release this young man. Each day this military government holds Arif hostage, it holds hostage the future of Bangladesh.

Release him now.

 

Posted in Bangladesh, Human Rights | 4 Comments

International Bloggers’ Day For Burma

Free Burma!

Join the growing list of international bloggers in a day of support for the brave people of Burma. Sign up here and just post one banner post on October 4, 2007 with the words "Free Burma!".

Posted in Human Rights, International | 3 Comments

The Forgotten People Of Burma

The thug who rules Burma: Senior General Than Shwe

[Cross posted at E-Bangladesh, Taylor Marsh, Daily Kos and Never In Our Names]

Bangladesh has its own illegal immigration problem. The country plays host to approximately 200,000 refugees from the bordering country of Burma. The refugees belong to the Rohingya minority, a persecuted Muslim population who are being methodically ethnically cleansed by Burma’s ruling military junta. They live in Bangladesh under desperate conditions, battling for scarce jobs and resources in the already desperately poor south eastern region of Bangladesh. It is just one of the silent tragedies of the forgotten people of Burma.

Burma, or Myanmar as the ruling military junta would like to be called, is one of the most brutally repressed countries in the world. It has been under military rule since 1962. An impoverished country of 50 million people, Burma boasts an army of over 400,000 active personnel. It’s yearly military budget stands at an estimated 7 billion dollars and is greater than Pakistan, Iran and North Korea. Burma has the 12th largest standing military in the world and spends an astounding 19% of its annual gross domestic product on the military. While the junta leaders live in luxury the rest of the population lives on less than $1 a day. Burma is the most corrupt nation on Earth.

The Burmese military is at war with its own people. It is so fearful of its own people that it has moved the capital of the country. In 2005 the military junta built a new capital, Naypyidaw, about 320 kilometers north of the former capital, and Burma’s largest city, of Rangoon. Naypyidaw is secretive and under tight seal. Cell phone networks do not work there and the civil servants are housed in military built apartments while the junta live in luxury villas. Pictures of Naypyidaw are hard to come by.

On September 6th the military junta in Burma declared that General Maung Aye, second in command in Burma, was postponing his upcoming visit to Bangladesh where he was expected to expand on the new found common ground with the military rulers of Bangladesh. This was the first signal from the junta that they were anticipating the August protests over high fuel prices to get significantly worse. Ten days later, on September 16, thousands of revered Burmese monks joined the protesters on the streets of Buma’s cities. The monks led the protesters to the doorstep of Nobel Peace Prize winner Aung San Suu Kyi’s home, where she has been held under house arrest and solitary isolation on and off for nearly 2 decades. The legitimate prime minister of Burma, and the embodiment of hope for the Burmese people, came out briefly to pray with the monks and the protesters. It was the first time the Burmese people saw her in four years.

However, as always hope was short-lived for the brave people of Burma. Aung San Suu Kyi was whisked away to a notorious prison in the Burmese interior and the Burmese military began the slaughter. In 1988, after similar protests, the military slaughtered 3000 citizens. This time the military claims to have only killed 10 people. The actual numbers are likely to be much higher. In 1988 the military junta claimed that only a handful of protesters were killed.

Today the Burmese people are cut off from the rest of the world. The internet, the lifeline connecting the Burmese people to the world, has been severed by the junta. The streets of Rangoon have been cleared of protesters and the blood has been cleaned from the pavements – protesters have been "disappeared" and the monks have been locked away in their monasteries. Into this surreal quiet arrived Ibrahim Gambari, the UN special envoy for Burma. In a "surprise" move the junta allowed Mr. Gambari to visit with Aung San Suu Kyi for about an hour.

This is familiar ground for Mr. Gambari. Last year he visited Burma twice and was similarly allowed to meet the Nobel laureate. On his return from his first trip in May 2006 Mr. Gambari penned an op-ed in the International Herald Tribune entitled "A crack in the Burmese door":

For a number of years now, the military leaders of Myanmar, formerly called Burma, have seemed impervious to international calls for democratic reform. A special UN envoy for Myanmar, Rezali Ismail, was prohibited for more than two years from even stepping foot in the country.

Last month, something seemed to change. Myanmar’s locked door popped open a small crack.

It is premature after one brief mission to come to any conclusions about the extent and depth of Myanmar’s current opening. Sustained engagement may be the only way to arrive at a fuller assessment of the prospects for democratization, development and reconciliation.

It will, of course, be up to the Security Council to decide on a course of action. Myanmar is hardly alone as a country for which the international community, in trying to influence the course of events, finds itself debating the relative merits of diplomacy versus pressure,or a combination of both.

Though some may be tempted to lose patience with the diplomatic track, I believe we have no option but to persist.

Nothing changed. The world moved on and the Burmese people were left to contend with their oppressors on their own.

Unlike previous visits this time Mr. Gambari has been unable to meet with the leaders of the military junta, including Senior General Than Shwe. This may be significant. There are already unconfirmed but credible reports that some generals, including Than Shwe, have sent their families abroad. It may signal a coup within the junta or fear within the junta that the protests may lead to the regime’s collapse. However, in a country where the military controls everything the prospects of freedom for the Burmese people are dim. If freedom comes it is likely to come at the cost of significant Burmese blood.

Burma’s two main backers, India and China, continue to feed its oversized military in order to squeeze a few extra dollars from the already impoverished Burmese people. While China and India continue to back the junta, there is little hope of a bright future for the Burmese people. While the sight of saffron-clad monks has captivated the world’s attention for this week, if the junta’s crackdown is successful the world will forget and move on once again.

Mr. Gambari will likely go home empty handed, save a token visit with Aung San Suu Kyi. The endless UN visits will continue as the junta appeases the foreigners by returning to the status quo. Mr. Bush will cynically thump his chest about military oppression in Burma while he offers full support to the military regime next door. China and India will continue to profit from the subjugation of the Burmese people.

Nonetheless, we who care about the brave Burmese people will not forget their plight. Even as the world moves on.

 [Sign the MoveOn.org petition to add your name to supporters of the brave Burmese people.]

Posted in Foreign Policy, Human Rights, International | 1 Comment

At The Heritage Foundation

[U.S. Deputy Assistant Secretary for South Asian Affairs John Gastright speaks about the Bush Administration’s strong support of the military government of Bangladesh at the Heritage Foundation on September 28, 2007. He took questions after his speech. The last question is from me. The full video of all the speakers is available here. ]

Yesterday I attended an event entitled "Bangladesh: Democracy at a Crossroads" at the Heritage Foundation in Washington D.C. The speakers at the event were Congressman Joseph Crowley, Deputy Assistant Secretary for South Asian Affairs John Gastright, and three Bangladeshi speakers (Wali-ur Rahman, Major General Muniruzzaman, and Dr. Ali Riaz).

I will update this post with my impressions of the event a little bit later. In the meantime, please view the videos above of John Gastright’s speech and question and answer session. Gastright’s discussion of the situation in Bangladesh was the most extensive public presentation of the Bush Administration’s position on the military takeover in Bangladesh to date. It is now clear that the Bush administration strongly backs the military regime in Bangladesh.

Posted in Bangladesh, Foreign Policy | 1 Comment

Bangladesh Chief Advisor Addresses The UN General Assembly

On September 27, 2007 the Chief Advisor of Bangladesh’s military government Fakhruddin Ahmed addressed the United Nations General Assembly (transcript of his speech). It was a disappointing speech. This unelected technocrat, the civilian face of Bangladesh’s military government, chose to speak for the military rather than the people.

Following are some choice excerpts:

  1. "Bangladesh reaffirms its unflinching commitment to universal and inalienable human rights. Any society committed to democracy requires the recognition and enforcement of human rights, and in Bangladesh the fight against corruption and the strengthening of the rule of law go hand in hand with the protection of human rights"
  2. "On the domestic front, we have taken stern measures against militant groups and their patrons"
  3. "Bangladesh represents an effective model of civil-military cooperation in crisis prevention." 
I’d like to make three brief observations in rebuttal:
  1. Bangladesh military has suspended all fundamental rights. It has jailed over 250,000 people. It is arresting citizens without any due process and without charge. It has beaten and tortured students, professors and journalists. It has intimidated the press, shut down television channels, provided "guidelines" to television stations as to who can be guests on talk shows, and it has banned publication of information that the military does not like.
  2. While the military cracked down hard on protesting students in August, it has allowed Islamists to hold multiple demonstrations on the streets of Bangladesh. The military bowed to Islamists by banning a harmless cartoon and then proclaiming that the cartoon represented a "conspiracy" against Bangladesh. The military forced the editor of the Prothom Alo newspaper to apologize multiple times to the leader of the Islamists for publishing the cartoons.
  3. The military is in charge of Bangladesh.  Military men have now been established in all major civilian ministries in the Bangladesh government. Civilians in Bangladesh take orders from their military bosses.

While in New York Fakhruddin Ahmed also spoke at the Asia Society. Dr. Ahmed was asked about the recent arrest of cartoonist Arifur Rahman for drawing a cartoon that elicited feigned outrage from the Islamists and the government. One attendee described the exchange as follows:

American think tank representative challenges FA on his statements about press freedom and mentions Arifur Rahman. Whole room goes silent. FA’s response (after awkward pause – only time he showed discomfort the whole evening): “You don’t realize that things could be a lot worse. We would have been within our rights to have much tighter controls on media, not that we have any controls at all – press is totally free. I understand that “some journalist may have been apprehended” and often this is for his own protection. But this is nothing that would not have happened at another time as well”.

There was a harsh silence after his response. That was one of the last questions and the American was surrounded by grateful BDs as the event closed thanking her for asking the qn. I wonder if they were scared to do the same, but it was clear that she represented the thoughts of a large # of the audience.

I am now convinced that Fakhruddin Ahmed has no idea what "freedom of the press" means. I also recall it was the KGB who used to arrest people for their own protection.

At another event at Columbia University, Fakhruddin Ahmed also gave a speech and took a limited number of questions. An attendee described some of the Q&A session:

arrest of cartoonist Arifur Rahman (asked by Dr. Austin); imprisonment and harassment of university teachers, students and others and Bangladeshi refugees in India . In his response although Dr Fakhruddin maintained that his government is “respectful” (?) of the freedom of press, he clearly avoided the issue of cartoonist Arifur Rahman’s arrest. But the question regarding imprisonment and persecution of university teachers, asked by a young South Asian student, shattered the image which Dr. Fakhruddin created of his government through his sugar-coated speech. It was interesting to notice, how Dr. Fakhruddin’s face turned grumpy as the question was asked. And his answer to this particular question was old rhetoric: that it was initially a “minor” incident that was magnified later through some anti-government agents in order to destabilize the country.

There was nothing minor about the protests in August. Tens of thousands of people marched and the government response was swift and brutal.

It appears that Dr. Fakhruddin Ahmed came to America to sell the military regime to the world. We were looking for someone to represent the people of Bangladesh at this year’s UN General Assembly; instead we got an apologist for the military government.

 

Posted in Bangladesh, Foreign Policy, Human Rights | 1 Comment