Sunita Paul: Plagiarist

Sunita Paul is a plagiarist.

Sunita Paul is a “journalist” who has recently been publishing a series of sensational articles about Bangladesh. She has caused quite a stir because her articles make extraordinary claims, based on anonymous sources, about the political situation in Bangladesh. Extraordinary claims without much factual support however require a significant leap of faith by the reader. Her articles, whether they should be believed, depend on her credibility.

I find that when a journalist is engaged in plagiarism, that is when a journalist makes false claims of authorship, the remainder of that journalist’s work should be viewed with extreme suspicion. Plagiarism is dishonesty. And Sunita Paul is a plagiarist.

On February 6th of this year, Sunita Paul published an article in the American Chronicle with the breathless headline “Ruling party getting set to try Bangladesh Generals.” Now, if the claim in the article’s headline were true, this would be big news. So, my interest was piqued when I came across this article. However, the article was thin on backing up the main charge in the headline. As I read further through the long article, though, I came across a number of paragraphs that seemed very familiar to me. In fact, they sounded like something I had written in 2007. As I read them carefully, and checked back on my earlier published posts, I realized the paragraphs were exactly what I had written in two articles about General Moeen Ahmed and his involvement with Trust Bank.

In Sunita Paul’s article, you will find the following passage about the Trust Bank affair:

General Moeen and his brother, Iqbal U Ahmed, are both on the board of directors of Trust Bank. This appears to violate Bangladesh Bank regulations that state “not more than one member of a family will become director of a bank. For this purpose family members shall include spouse, parents, children, brothers and sisters of the director and other persons dependent on him/her.”

General Moeen points out that his brother was already the Managing Director of the Bank when General Moeen became Chairman of Trust Bank. However, in November 2006, while General Moeen was Chairman, his brother was reappointed Managing Director of Trust Bank. This appears to violate the Bangladesh Bank regulations which state that the above “restriction shall apply to appointment/reappointment of the directors”.

General Moeen and his brother, Iqbal, on Trust Bank´s board of directors, they are borrowers of large sums of money from the bank. According to a prospectus filed by Trust Bank before its IPO, General Moeen had a loan with an outstanding balance of Tk. 9,969,215 at the end of 2005. By the end of 2006, the outstanding amount had been reduced to Tk. 3,315,323. His brother, the Managing Director, had an outstanding loan balance of Tk. 1,775,242 at the end of June 2006. At the end of 2005 General Moeen´s loan amount was by far the largest loan given to any director or senior executive of Trust Bank.

The ownership of Trust Bank, before the IPO, consisted of 7,000,000 shares, with 6,999,920 shares held by Army Welfare Trust. Of the remaining shares, General Moeen owned 10 shares. His brother, Iqbal, owned no shares. Each share was valued at Tk. 100. Therefore General Moeen owned Tk. 1000 worth of shares. According to Bangladesh Bank regulations he was entitled, with the approval of the board of directors, to get a loan for an amount up to Tk. 500. In other words, at the end of 2005 General Moeen had a loan Tk. 9,968,715 in excess of the amount allowed by the law.

The reason the Bangladesh Bank regulations are in place is to guard against abuse of power by directors of private banks – that is to say, to prevent corruption.

In the article, she writes the above passage as her own. She does not cite me as the author of those words, nor does she put the passage in quotations.

Now compare the first two paragraphs that I noted above to these two paragraphs from my post entitled “A Matter Of Trust” published on October 20, 2007:

  • General Moeen and his brother, Iqbal U Ahmed, are both on the board of directors of Trust Bank. This appears to violate Bangladesh Bank regulations that state “not more than one member of a family will become director of a bank. For this purpose family members shall include spouse, parents, children, brothers and sisters of the director and other persons dependent on him/her.”
  • General Moeen points out that his brother was already the Managing Director of the Bank when General Moeen became Chairman of Trust Bank. However, in November 2006, while General Moeen was Chairman, his brother was reappointed Managing Director of Trust Bank. This appears to violate the Bangladesh Bank regulations which state that the above “restriction shall apply to appointment/reappointment of the directors”.
  • You will notice that she has plagiarized my published work word for word.

    Now compare the next three paragraphs in her article that I noted above to these three paragraphs from my post entitled “Coming To America – Junta Banking Edition” published on October 18, 2007:

    Not only are General Moeen and his brother, Iqbal, on Trust Bank’s board of directors, they are also borrowers of large sums of money from the bank. According to a prospectus filed by Trust Bank before its IPO, General Moeen had a loan with an outstanding balance of Tk. 9,969,215 at the end of 2005. By the end of 2006, the outstanding amount had been reduced to Tk. 3,315,323. His brother, the Managing Director, had an outstanding loan balance of Tk. 1,775,242 at the end of June 2006. At the end of 2005 General Moeen’s loan amount was by far the largest loan given to any director or senior executive of Trust Bank.

    The ownership of Trust Bank, before the IPO, consisted of 7,000,000 shares, with 6,999,920 shares held by Army Welfare Trust. Of the remaining shares, General Moeen owned 10 shares. His brother, Iqbal, owned no shares. Each share was valued at Tk. 100. Therefore General Moeen owned Tk. 1000 worth of shares. According to Bangladesh Bank regulations he was entitled, with the approval of the board of directors, to get a loan for an amount up to Tk. 500. In other words, at the end of 2005 General Moeen had a loan Tk. 9,968,715 in excess of the amount allowed by the law.

    The reason the Bangladesh Bank regulations are in place is to guard against abuse of power by directors of private banks – that is to say, to prevent corruption.

    Again, they are the same, save a minor change in the first sentence. Sunita Paul has plagiarized word for word from two of my published posts.

    Not only has Sunita Paul plagiarized my work, she has used copyrighted material without my consent.

    Now, it should come as no surprise that Sunita Paul is listed as a writer for the Weekly Blitz, the tabloid that is run by Salah Uddin Shoaib Choudhury. She also rather coincidentally writes in a number of other publications, including American Chronicle, that publish Mr. Choudhury. Over the last several years, Mr. Choudhury and his well-funded American neoconservative friends have been driving hard to drum up trouble in Bangladesh. Judging by her articles, Ms. Paul appears to be part of this larger effort.

    Sunita Paul publishes rather prodigiously about Bangladesh in a number of publications including American Chronicle and Global Politician. Since at least a half a dozen such publications have published her plagiarized article, I intend to contact them and let them know that she has plagiarized and has also violated copyright.

    I hope that the next time you the reader come across another breathless article from Sunita Paul, that you consider what credibility you want to attach to a plagiarist.

    UPDATE In the wake of my op-ed on The Daily Star exposing her plagiarism, the article on American Chronicle has now been deleted. However, the Google cache of the deleted article is still available here. The article is also currently available at Global Politician and Priyo.com.

    Posted in Bangladesh, Media, Politics | Tagged , , , , , , | 69 Comments

    Cherry Blossoms In Washington DC

    [Click to see Slideshow]

    It was a very cloudy morning today in Washington. Even under a blanket of clouds the Cherry Blossoms looked spectacular. Three friends and I, with cameras in hand, spent a wonderful few hours this morning visiting nature’s springtime gift to Washington DC.

    This little guy was also enjoying the blossoms at the Tidal Basin this morning :

    Liveblog via Twitter from this morning:

    8:46:46 AM: I’m headed into DC under cloudy skies to try to take some pictures of cherry blossoms before the rain starts.

    9:12:55 AM: The weather is refusing to cooperate. Slight drizzle now.

    9:44:03 AM: We’re finally here at the Tidal Basin. GPS location: http://bit.ly/fV1Ob

    10:16:31 AM: http://twitpic.com/2ohas – The monument:

    1:16:50 PM: http://twitpic.com/2olof – Best I can do with the iPhone. The pics with the real camera will have to wait till I get back.

    Posted in Personal | Tagged , , , , , | 5 Comments

    Restructure, Restructure, Restructure

    The Obama administration has lost patience with General Motors and has demanded that it restructure before it will get any more government help. That seems logical enough. Yet, when both the Obama administration and the Bush administration have given hundreds of billions of dollars to banks, that money came with no strings attached.

    In demanding General Motors’ CEO Rick Wagoner’s head, President Obama announced:

    “Year after year, decade after decade, we’ve seen problems papered over and tough choices kicked down the road.”

    It is a statement that he could have equally applied to the banking industry. Yet, time and again, when faced with asking the banks to restructure as a condition of getting bailout money, the government has balked. It seems that accountability is only demanded of American industries that actually produce tangible products. It does not apply to the Masters of the Universe who have made gambling legal in all fifty states by simply calling it “trading” in “derivatives”.

    It should not be a surprise to anyone that the Obama administration is unable to tell the banks to do what they must do. After all, hundreds of billions of dollars of taxpayer money is being doled out to the banks by this clown. Until this clown, and other similar-minded clowns, leave the government for clown school, nothing will change.

    Today General Motors, long the engine of American middle class prosperity, got a much deserved slap by the federal government. Maybe tomorrow the banks will get a slap or two. But I doubt it.

    Posted in Economy, Politics | Tagged , , | 5 Comments

    BDR Massacre Photos Surface On The Internet

    Photographs purporting to depict the moments before the massacre at BDR Headquarters on February 25th have surfaced on Facebook and a number of Bengali blogs.

    It is unclear who leaked these photographs and why they were leaked. In one of the photos, two more cameramen and a video camera are visible. It would appear that there are more pictures and possibly a video of the event. The text narrative released with the photos claims (rather incredibly) that two assassins came out from behind the curtains with sub-machine guns (not shown in the photos), failed to fire, and then fainted. Then, according to this narrative, as army officers tended to the fainted assassins other assassins came in through the doors from outside the hall and the killings began.

    The photos raise more questions than they answer.

    I have reposted the set of 10 photographs on Flickr. Click here to view the photos.

    Posted in Bangladesh | Tagged , , , | 18 Comments

    Joseph Stiglitz: “Robbery Of The American People”

    Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz does not like the Geithner plan:

    “The Geithner plan is very badly flawed,” Stiglitz told Reuters in an interview during a Credit Suisse Asian Investment Conference in Hong Kong.

    U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner’s plan to wipe up to US$1 trillion in bad debt off banks’ balance sheets, unveiled on Monday, offered “perverse incentives,” Stiglitz said.

    The U.S. government is basically using the taxpayer to guarantee against downside risk on the value of these assets, while giving the upside, or potential profits, to private investors, he said.

    “Quite frankly, this amounts to robbery of the American people. I don’t think it’s going to work because I think there’ll be a lot of anger about putting the losses so much on the shoulder of the American taxpayer.”

    Even if the plan clears banks of massive toxic debt, worries about the economic outlook mean banks could still be unwilling to make fresh loans, while the prospect of a higher tax burden to pay for various government stimulus plans could further undermine U.S. consumers, he said.

    Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman has already come out strongly against Geithner’s plan. Today he responds to Larry Summers:

    Larry is a first-rate economist with a job to do, and I wish him luck in it. He understands what I’m saying, of course, but he’s doing his best to support the official line.

    That line now goes like this: first, the Geithner put is just “one component of the plan” — although the other components are invisible to the rest of us, now that the stress test seems to have been downgraded to irrelevance. Second, rather than defending the large subsidy the plan creates for anyone who buys troubled assets, administration officials tout the virtues of markets in general, and say, hey, this creates a market, so it must be good.

    It’s a bit disappointing to see the Obama administration engaging in this sort of market-worship — hailing markets as a Good Thing in themselves, rather than as an often but not always useful means to an end. But I have reason to think that unlike the Bushies, they don’t really believe it; it’s just politics. Which is actually better than having genuine market fanatics running things, I guess.

    Not all Nobel Laureates are dissing the Geithner plan. Michael Spence, who shared the Nobel Prize with Stiglitz, said “it could work”, although he called it a “little complex to implement”:

    “This program is crucially dependent on the private sector as participants and price setters,” said Spence, 65, who shared the Nobel Prize with George Akerlof and Joseph Stiglitz for a theory that found some government intervention can make markets more efficient. “It could work,” Spence said in a telephone interview yesterday.

    While Spence, a Stanford University professor and former business-school dean, has more confidence in Geithner, even he isn’t positive the Treasury secretary can pull it off.

    The Treasury plan “is a little complex to implement,” Spence said. “I assume the Treasury has done its homework, and has people lined up” to commit private capital to Geithner’s public-private partnerships, he said.

    No word yet on whether Hank Paulson likes Geithner’s plan.

    Posted in Economy, Politics | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment